radish Wrote: > Likewise, I am convinced that a sample size of 1 does not give an > accurate representation of reality. > > SlimServer runs just fine on Windows for me. 900 albums, 10000 tracks, > 3500 artists. Responses via web or remote are virtually instant. This > is on a machine cobbled together from spares running vanilla XP/SP2 and > the last official release of SlimServer. Now we have a sample size of > just 2, but the conclusion is considerably less clear. > > You obviouly have problems, and for that I am sympathetic, but to come > to the conclusion that Perl (or even Java for that matter) is the > problem is a real stretch, and not backed up by the evidence.
I have no such problems either on my Windows/SB2 setup. The only annoyance I get is periods when remote commands are followed by delays of up to about two seconds; at most times response is virtually instantaneous. I do not think Perl itself can be fingered for any SlimServer performance problems. However, regardless of the proportion of users ModelCitizen's experience represents, his problem is obviously real. I hope its cause can be found and corrected. -- abdomen _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
