ModelCitizen Wrote: > This is very similar to my experience of SlimServer. As my library has > grown the performance has decreased, this with a SB1 and a SB2 (library > currently consists of 800 flac albums). I was hoping that the addition > of the database with version 6 might sort out my performance problems, > but instead they have just got worse. > The differences between your experience and mine is that I never > receive the "Can't locate SlimServer" message and that I can sometimes > wait for over a minute for it to list albums/artists/tracks. What is > interesting is that performance varies, sometimes it can list stuff > quickly, but this is rare (and never when I am in a hurry). > > I have used four different Windows XP machines for SlimServer, the last > one being a 3.5ghz, 1gb RAM machine. The perfomance on all of them has > been similarly deplorable. I am currently using 6.1.1. > MC
See, this is the weird bit. I also have around 800 albums, mixture of flac and vorbis. I'm also running 6.1.1 on XP. My hardware is low spec - Athlon 1.3 & 512mb. However, using the tests in the original post (Browse Genres/All Artists or Browse Artists/All Albums) the response is instant - no lag at all. The slowest thing I can find to do is Browse Albums/All Songs, which takes around 30 seconds (for ~10000 tracks). I can't explain the difference between my experience and others. -- radish _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
