EricBergan;593810 Wrote: > I went through the same thing a few weeks ago. Ended up going with the > Touch because it turned out to only be a little more than getting a > Classic. > > I use coax digital out, so can't say I really notice an audio > difference (and I'm usually fairly discriminating on audio.) Also, my > SB is in a closed audio cabinet, so the color display/touch screen is > really a non-issue for me. > > Now, I'm not sure I made the right choice. Because I went with the > Touch, had to upgrade the version of my server, and I lost direct IR > remote control of favorites. So I've actually taken a step backwards in > user friendliness. There are a couple of other areas where I think the > settings on the Touch has been "dumbed down" from the classic, although > none as serious. > > eric
Hi, i bought a new classic a month ago (amazon) to have a spare in case. anyway , i bought an amplifier and speakers , so i have a system in the basement. my main classic ( slimdevice) is also behind glasses , in ethernet bridge mode for a wd tv live plus. ( so the classic 'share' is wireless mode ). if i changed for the touch, i would have to change the server version lose the bridge mode i also have a boom -- pgnyc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pgnyc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7958 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=83786 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
