> Quite true. I got interesting results (connecting to my server 150km > further southwest using SSH :-)): > > [0.375] Artists: 433 > [0.032] Albums : 544 > [0.031] Songs : 6543 > [0.031] Genres : 50 > [20.891] titles 0 10 > [16.235] titles 0 100 > [29.329] titles 0 1000 > [114.393] titles 0 10000 > > Interestingly "titles 0 10" was slower than "titles 0 100" three out of > four times I run the test. (BTW: what does that command actually do?)
According to the CLI tech docs, it returns songs (with the first number as the start number, and the second one the maximum number of titles returned, so "titles 0 10" gives you the first 10 songs). > This is on a Via C3/1GHz/512MB running SME Linux. > >> The output of this file on my laptop (the starting value is the time in >> seconds it took to execute the command): > > Maybe you should give some numbers about you configuration (CPU, RAM). This was on a P4 2.8 GHz with 1 GB RAM, running 5 instances of SlimServer. The songs themselves are on an iPod, but that probably doesn't matter for the times reported, as they interact with the database. Niek. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
