erland;648148 Wrote: > As you can see, my results are very different from the similar results > JJZolx saw with 65 000 tracks. In all my tests SQLite is a lot faster > than MySQL which is completely opposite to what JJZolx got earlier in > his tests on Windows.
No, I did not test with a 65,000 track library. The library had 260,000 tracks. The results I posted above showed the elapsed time at different points in the scan. I see results similar to yours when the library is small. -- JJZolx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89391 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
