cliveb;665817 Wrote: > I don't trust Apple's motives. > It depends what you think are those motives... cliveb;665817 Wrote: > > I predict that once Apple has rendered other lossless codecs obsolete, > they will "improve" ALAC and keep it closed source, then extract > lucrative licence fees from all the third parties who have followed the > herd. > This would be absurd, I don't have memory of Apple doing such a (self-defeating) move. cliveb;665817 Wrote: > > Rather than everyone else adding support for ALAC, wouldn't it just be > easier for Apple to support FLAC?
Of course not, why a company should force their customers to convert all their audio files?! Makes much more sense that "new" customers convert their FLAC files to enter the Apple world. -- lucas72 'QNAP Club Italy' (www.qnapclub.it) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ lucas72's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11288 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91185 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
