I've been using Squeezebox for a while now and have enthusiastically
recommended it to others (some of whom have actually purchased it). I
can't bring myself to recommend it to someone with the caveat that they
will need another 70-80mb of memory and additional cpu capacity to
support it...even when it's not in use.

I see the memory footprint getting increasingly bloated. Now we have an
additional 7mb of memory to run some other process in the tray.

I'm a software developer myself. We have an enterprise wide application
that tracks all the assets and associated maintenance, accounting, etc
for a VERY large institution. It does not use as much memory and other
resources as Squeezebox.

It seems like the software needs to be rearchitected so different
plug-ins are only loaded as they are used and are unloaded when not in
use (see Eclipse).

Sorry to go negative, but I would like to see the software improved.


-- 
baconrad
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to