Wombat wrote: 
> Perceptual coding is not like zipping a file. No mp3 encoder left out
> the real behaviour with testing. It is not like one simple algorythm
> leaves out information. There are many choices an encoder has to do and
> all of them are fine-tuned by real listeners on a huge sample corpus. So
> even if the FFT that may be used as part of evaluating what to leave out
> another choice of manualy changing the masking behaviour makes the
> encoder a good one or a bad one.
> The news that some aspect of human hearing behaves different as some FFT
> changes nothing here.
> 
> After reading some things on the net i see several audiophile claims now
> take parts of that paper as prove for everything that makes no sense.
> Totaly unfounded and out of context.
> 
> You may read some posts here from J. D. Johnston on Hydrogenaudio:
> http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=99371&st=25
> He is one real authority on the subject and knows everything behind it.
> I even may quote his statement about the thread title over there. The
> thread is called "Human hearing beats FFT"
> Quote: "So, the headline is just confused, it's comparing an apple, an
> orange, and a crate full of bowling balls, and concluding that apples
> are orange-colored and weigh 12 lbs."

I think we sort of agree.  The paper is a paper.  It's in "theory
space".  In practice things are different and the paper might have some
implications in edge cases.  Also in practice people test encoders etc. 
I can see how it can be misused by the other crowd.  I wasn't trying to
say that lossy encoding is no good.  I can't tell the difference between
a mp3 and a flac if the bitrate isn't too low. But I know I don't like
low bit rate mp3.   

I wil read the other comments. Thanks!


------------------------------------------------------------------------
lrossouw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3416
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98124

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to