Quoting Michaelwagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
kdf Wrote:
like it is ever not a consideration.OK, maybe I should have worded
that better, like give it a higher
priority. I was rushing to go to work.
Well, as a bit of backstory...
5.4.1 maintained all data resident in memory. Typical footprint well over
100megs
6.0+ uses db, typical footprint being discussed 80 megs or so.
Since 6.0 Michael Herger has optimised plugin loading to reduce things
by a few
more megs, as well as loading strings only as needed (chosen language plus EN
only).
Now, look through the posts and you'll find that some users want everything
faster again and running in memory like it used to be.
Understandably, you have your own criteria for your needs. I tend have
a little
more faith that the people in charge of this actually know what they are doing
and are properly balancing needs (instead of catering just to the most vocal)
Without that, code would be going back and forth with zero progress.
-k
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
