bpa wrote: > I think so. IIRC test have shown 96k AAC is much preferred than 128k > MP3. So I expect 64k AAC could be similar to 128k MP3. AAC is a better > encoder and it has more modern psychoacoustics so I believe AAC stream > often sound better even if they are not more failthful.
What is the point of having 2 different encodings for the same stream. I presume it is just for compatibility issues. Apart from the fact a AAC is better than a MP3, why a 128 sounds exactly a 64 ? It probably means the source is already crappy probably! Now, if I understand, the problem is more in RTBF shop than in TuneIn? Touch + Cambridge Audio 651R & DAC Magic + Q Acoustics 1050i / Touch + Onkyo TX-SR309 + Morel Applause MKII / SB2, SB3, and Duet (not used) / Boom / 5 Radios (2 red, 1 black & 2 whites) / Ipeng & SqueezePad / Windows 7 + LMS 7.7.3 - 1375965195 on ASRock ION 330 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ didjean's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2900 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=99513 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
