On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:48 -0500, Wendy Seltzer wrote: > I also join all the movements of a piece into a single file, which has > the side benefit of making randomized play work more effectively. So > my directory for the same recording would look like > symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Muti.flac
Does this lead to symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Toscanini_BBC.flac symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Toscanini_LaScala.flac symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Mengelberg.flac symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Szell_Cleveland.flac symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Szell_London.flac symphonic/Beethoven,_Ludwig_van/Symphony_No._9_in_d_min/Szell_Columbia.flac Now the 9th is one of the worst cases, everyone has recorded it at least once. But the conductor and orchestra and often the vocal chorus all deserve to be part of the identifying indicies. And maybe you'd want to listen to how the LSO plays the first movement under the direction of Muti, Szell and Toscanini. > (also searching for the elusive "best way" to catalogue classical) To be followed up with which is the best recoring of the 9th :-) -- Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
