Michaelwagner Wrote: > Both are true. > > The bit about being acknowledged seems to have been misunderstood, by > the way ... if there's going to be a performance problem on a given > system, it's acknowledged that the original SLiMP3, having the smallest > buffer, will have the hardest time. The SB2 (&3) can go for most of a > minute without being fed music and not blink. The SB1 about 5-10 > seconds. The SLiMP3 about half that, perhaps less, depends on a variety > of things. > > Michael
I did not know this, and it explains quite a bit. Thank you for clarifying. Any issue with performance (e.g. 6.2 start up and scanning) will be made painfully obvious on my SLiMP3 and it's small buffer. I just wish this information was easier to come by. It would have saved me some typing and p&ssing off a number of people. JB -- Bonesteel ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bonesteel's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1438 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17926 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
