R1200CL wrote: 
> I think you have totally misunderstood what MQA is and offers. You
> should not tell direct lies like this.

You are not winning any friends by that approach. If you think Mnyb has
misunderstood something about MQA, then please point out the facts.
Calling stuff "lies" is not helpful, unless you have clear evidence that
Mnyb is spreading false information on purpose.

> MQA is Lossless.

Depends on your definition of "lossless". It is lossless for the upper
bits, but "steals" lower bits to represent HF information.

> And all major record companies support MQA, and actually have started
> the prosess of implementing MQA into their masters.

So which record companies have actually committed to supporting MQA? 

> I can't understand why you are against implementing MAQ into Squeezebox,
> or have I misunderstood your post ?

And I can't understand why you are so for implementing it. What benefits
do you think it will bring?

> Hopfully they read this post and can email MQA about licence issue. 
> http://www.musicischanging.com has just updated their pages.

Interestingly, the only "content partner" they list is 2L, not really
one of the major record companies. If the others are supporting MQA, why
are they not mentioned?

The "how it works" section is thick on hype, thin on facts.

> MQA is very new to people, and for some strange reason, many are
> skeptical to MQA.

The "strange reason" might be that it is yet another proprietary,
licensed format that doesn't bring any benefits.



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=102648

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to