Pat Farrell wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:54 -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
Pat Farrell wrote:
My problem is not about the speed, it's about building a whole new CDDB
type system without leveraging anything else that's already out there.
I haven't proposed any such thing.
But I'm not sure it is all that useful to discuss it, it is probably
time to sling some code.
Okay, sorry if I'm reading more into your statements than you've
intended. As you say, it's probably best to go forward with your plan
rather than spend more time trying to explain it.
I wouldn't consider the database stable
until that wipe-and-rebuild button in the server settings can go away :)
That's the first patch I have to submit to the developers.
The second is a utility to automagically handle schema changes.
I do hope you mean a patch to make the database stable rather than a
patch to make the button go away :) Even I could do the latter, but
sadly I and many others still need the button.
...
Think enhancement, not replacement.
But the more important idea is that this is what I've
planned to do since we started talking about 6.0.0 long
ago. Its what I'm gonna do
when I grow up. You don't have to use it.
Cool -- I look forward to trying it out.
--
Jack At Monkeynoodle Dot Org: It's A Scientific Venture!
"I spent all me tin with the ladies drinking gin
so across the Western ocean I must wander" -- trad.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
