philippe_44 wrote: > Which also reminded me that SqueezeSlave is doing its own volume method > implementation... crap. Is this still in use today?
wt0 wrote: > You're probably OK to ignore SqueezeSlave. I highly doubt that anyone > still uses it. Can you even get SqueezeSlave anymore? Yes squeezeslave binaries and source are still available. However, in the last 3 months it's only been downloaded 28 times and I've stopped supported it, so I'd consider it obsolete. Softsqueeze, the java client, however is a bit more active at 1561 downloads in the last 3 months and I've released one update in the last 11 years. Does this even matter for the Balance feature? If the client doesn't report the capability and they are not hardware players, the balance code path shouldn't impact them? Ralphy *1*-Touch, *5*-Classics, *3*-Booms, *2*-UE Radio 'Squeezebox client builds' (https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmsclients/files/) 'donations' (https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=LL5P6365KQEXN&lc=CA&item_name=Squeezebox%20client%20builds¤cy_code=USD&bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donate_SM%2egif%3aNonHosted) always appreciated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3484 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=114010 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
