I think it may be necessary to characterise the "http capable client" a bit better ? Will it include "old" target system (e.g. Win95, netPCs, old Chromebooks) Is it for occasional users such as Android TV/Firestick or on port 80only accessible (e.g. firewalled office) Do you see a big take up of this facility .
If choice is between aac vs opus, I think fundamental question is - is there "better" support among the target player for adts/aac than opus ? If this facility is going to be consistently used by less than (say) 10% of LMS users, then the codec should be one which is most widespread availability (i.e. highest likelihood of success) and CPU usage is a secondary concern. AFAICT aac support is in all (old & new) browser is better than opus. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=114590 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
