Quoting DrNic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
KDF, this is going to seem like I've been making this up (or am just plain crazy) but I downloaded the screen grab software you suggested and went to see the differences in your web skin between 5.3.1 and 6.2.2 and (ah hem) they were both the same again!!
cool! If you do find out it was the drugs, tho, please share. I could use a few. :)
I don't think I was on any psychotropic drugs at the time I noticed this, but it certainly isn't there now! Don't know what "cured" the problem... I do see the slight difference in spacing that you talk about in an earlier post - but this is not dramatic.
well, there was a big shift in the way the sizing is now done. I could come to believe that it was some old cached sizing mixing with the new that gave bizarre results. If the images were enlarged somehow, then the gap would seem scrunched. Previous spacing was either 2 or 3 pixels (I haven't looked it up) and now it is one (between cells). Old style was as consistent, and now that it is cleaned up, I don't think that going back to a spacing of 2 would be so bad.
Still trying to sort out my bizzare track name thing though. (haven't got round to looking in the db yet!)
You always have the option of filling out a bug report and attaching your db to it. There are always other people who can look it over and fix it. I'm certainly not trying to discourage that. I do, however, find it quicker and more rewarding to find things myself. Or at least to understand the source of the problem, if I can't actually fix it. It is your choice whether a lok into that side of slimserver is worth it to you. The important thing is to not lose the details of the problem so that, one way or another, it can be fixed.
-kdf _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
