First of all, many thanks to those of you who have posted your
experiences here -- reading though them helped answer a lot of my
questions as I chose and then configured my Squeezeboxes.

To save power and noise, I didn't want the WinXP machine on which I
have SlimServer installed to run 24/7; I prefer to leave it in standby,
and use the wireless SB3's wake-on-lan feature to bring it up when
needed.  However, as is the case with others in these forums, my 
server also connects to the network wirelessly.  Since most wireless
cards don't support wake-on-lan, I needed to find a workaround.  Due to
server placement, I can't simply connect the server to my router with
ethernet cable; the server has to be wireless.  

As many before have mentioned, the issue with getting WoL to work is
that, although the signal can be sent wirelessly, it ultimately needs
to be _received_ through a wired NIC for the computer to wake up.  So I
needed to find a way to convert that wireless WoL signal to something
that could be pushed through the wired NIC of a wireless PC.  Following
from a variant on Jim's suggestion in this thread on 08 Nov, here's what
I did (it requires some extra hardware lying around, but it works):

1) PC running SlimServer has two NICs: 1 wireless and 1 wired. This PC
connects to a wireless router, and the internet, through the wireless
NIC.  

2) I had a second (disused) Netgear wireless router lying around. Since
the wired NIC on the server was unused, and _does_ provide wake-on-lan
capability, I connected this wired NIC to one of the wired ports on the
second router.  There is nothing "upstream" of this router.  It just
sits atop my wireless server, unconnected to the outside world.  Its
sole purpose is to serve Squeezeboxes via the _wired_ NIC on the PC. 
The PC, though, is still wireless.  There's no Cat5 connecting it to
the "primary" router, and no Cat5 between the secondary and primary
routers.  

3) I configured the second router to create a new wireless network
(call it "SqueezeboxesOnly" or some such).  Now there are two wireless
networks in the house: the original network, which all the PCs
(including the server) connect to and use to get online, and the second
network, which only the Squeezeboxes (and the server, through its wired
port) use.

4) Because the server is connected to a router through its wired NIC,
when a Squeezebox sends a WoL signal wirelessly, my secondary router
routes it to the PC through the ethernet cable, and the PC rouses from
its sleep.

5) Windows, for all its faults, behaves happily with two functional
NICs.  The PC maintains a wireless connection to the original network,
allowing internet traffic to get through, while the wired connection to
the SqueezeboxesOnly network handles music.

6) The only problem in this setup is that the Squeezeboxes can't yet
connect to the internet -- they can only connect to the SlimServer,
because there's nothing upstream of the dedicated wireless router
they're on (they can still display RSS feeds, though, since the PC that
sends them to each SB3 can connect to the internet).  I'm hopeful that
WinXP's network bridging feature will help rectify this, but I haven't
been able to get it work yet. 

Nonetheless, having the ability to do a wake-on-lan to a wireless PC is
worth the lack of internet connectivity to me, since I don't listen to
much internet radio (I prefer XM ;) 

(And for what it's worth, I don't seem to be having the problem that
others have mentioned about the PC not staying awake after WoL; I
actually have the opposite problem - it won't go back to sleep after no
activity from the SB3, even after the timeout specified in Power
Management).

Perhaps this will help someone else...


-- 
mkdprice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mkdprice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3135
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=17891

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to