Listener wrote:
pfarrell Wrote:
More importantly, I'm not sure what you hope to get with this.
I earned a living writing software until I retired. I understand the
point.
Then as a pro, I really don't understand what you hope by
posting a list of demands.
It may be convenient for Slim Devices to regard itself as "mostly a
hardware company" but the Squeezebox is not very useful without
Slimserver.
I do not work for Slim, I do not speak for them. I am just a happy
customer.
But if you notice, a lot of their recent firmware support,
in addition to doing stuff that SlimServer users like me want, is to
enable to SqueezeBox to work without a PC, without a SlimServer.
SqueezeNetwork and all that.
They need to make a bigger investment.
Perhaps, you think so. I ask where the investment is going from,
and how is a business case made for it without raising the price
of the hardware from where it is. I don't want the stuff you
demand. I would gladly like it if it was free. But we pros
know that TINSTAAFL. So where does the investment come from?
I'm all for freedom of expression, but I like 99% of what
my slimserver has delivered for more than two years now.
Maybe my way of describing problems offends you.
You think maybe?
Developers are always welcome, check out the developers list.
See how overworked, underpaid they are. Re-read your demands
and see if you really think honey is ineffective at attracting bees.
--
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
