JJZolx Wrote: > I totally agree. > > I'm surprised a better configurtion system isn't in place. I can > understand the current approach for a first-generation product, but the > SB has had more than enough time to get to this point. Fully capable > configuration and status web interfaces are available in $30 consumer > routers that make the setup procedures for the Squeezebox look like > something out of a network product from 1993. Very primitive, to put > it politely.
I wouldn't say primitive, but it is a bit simplistic. I wonder though, is this configuration stored in the SB's firmware or is is sent from SlimServer? If the latter, then it should be an easy change. If the former, well the firmware would require a new design entirely (larger flash memory hosting a small OS, etc). -- EnochLight ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EnochLight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3392 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20407 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
