On 4/3/06, rock wrote: > > funkstar Wrote: > > I think your first two have been sugested before. Personaly i can't see > > them happening. I would guess that two of the bigest cost componets are > > the processor/decoder module and the wirless interface, both of which > > you would need for either a headless or head only device. > > > > Now a headless device I'd think you could forgo the wireless, the > application would be a centralized amp system. If someone took the > trouble to run speaker wires to remote locations it would seem pretty > easy to pull Cat-5 over. But we're only talking the difference of the > cost of the display so you are probably right about the cost > efffectiveness. Now if there could be a headless system that could do > four different streams, to four different amps that might be more > effective.
Isn't a headless system that can do four different streams to four different amps just the same as a PC with four good-quality sound-cards, running four copies of either SoftSqueeze or SqueezeSlave, running to four remote sets of speakers? Cheers Geoff _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
