JSonnabend Wrote: 
> I reached the same conclusion as Malor and Brownie after thinking about
> my alternatives.  I don't have Access, so I'll have to write a routine
> in Delphi or C# using DAO/ADO/OLEDB/ABCDE (or whatever MS is calling
> the COM interface these days).[]  
> 
> We can tell SlimServer not to scan, it's too bad we can't tell it not
> to update the DB other times.  Oh well.  Thanks to everyone for the
> input.  Sorry about the thread title, I was feeling a bit frustrated
> when I posted, I guess.
I don't think you ever said why you just don't tag the files and be
done with it.  Unless you're using a format that doesn't really support
tags, such as WAV.  If you can write a program to populate the database,
then you could likely find a tagging library or utility to just as
easily let you transfer that data to tags in the files.

But I have to agree with you... It would be nice if SlimServer could be
set to not muck with the library data except when explicitly told to do
so.  That way we might write our own library scanning utility and not
have to worry about the data being changed by Slim Server when we're
doing something as (seemingly) benign as browsing in one of the user
interfaces.


-- 
JJZolx

Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=23061

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to