Thanks for the response, Sean.  The Transporter looks great
feature-wise but pricey for those of us who have already gotten used
to SB *and* the big savings from eliminating a pre-amp from the
system.  My frugal self would normally rather spend $1000 on a good
DAC and $1000 on an sb4 than $2000 on an sb4.   But we haven't heard
it yet... The Grace m902 is about $1500 and Transporter may be better.

Can the Transporter's DAC function without a slimserver connection?

So if I put a Transporter at the heart of my playback and build out my
24/96 collection (already pretty substantial), I would still not be
able to play that library on my satellite sb2's and sb3's..  They
could not be sync'd.  I am really wondering how hard the sb2/3 96k
support would be and if it will ever happen.   I hate the thought of
trying to kludge softsqueeze with a soundcard  or trying to hack
transcoding filters to send output to a soundcard when I have sb3's.


Thanks,

 FL


On 7/24/06, seanadams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

freelunch Wrote:
> >From what I've just read about the Transporter, it appears that it
> will support 24/96 playback. I am curious about the changes that are
> being made to the slimserver code to support that. Could those changes
> support 24/96 playback on the sb3?  How about 24/96 digital output
> from the sb3?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> FL

This is a hardware/firmware thing, not SlimServer. It's not that it
can't be done on SB3, but it would be a separate engineering effort due
to different hardware in Transporter to facilitate higher sample rates.


--
seanadams
------------------------------------------------------------------------
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25779

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to