On 8/16/06, fingers wrote:
actually.... yes it does! I run SlimServer on multiple machines. All the machines are a minimum of 2.8GHz up to 3.06GHz. All my machines have 1GB of RAM and large hard drives with more than enough space remaining on each drive. Everyone of my machines not only pegs the CPU when scanning. But also comes close just during normal operation, even when Slim.exe is idle. All of my machines are running the latest version of Windows XP Pro with all the latest patches. All machines are running SlimServer 6.3.0 - 8148
You might want to consider diving into the 6.5 builds. I did this the other day, and was pleasantly surprised - scanning went off and did it's thing in it's own thread, the CPU didn't top out, and everything went smoothly. I didn't time anything (I will do if anyone wants it), but the *experience* was good - better than with 6.3.1. Which is the point, right? I also added a few albums last night, making sure that the modified dates were the current time, then told SS to scan for new/modified music. Again, it was non-intrusive, took around 3 minutes, and that was sorting through a library of 1200 albums. My machine is 2.3GHz 1GB, with XP Pro. If you do go that way, of course make sure you have a way back :) Cheers Geoff _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
