ceejay;132586 Wrote: > Interesting idea... as a variation on the theme, why not arrange for > this data to be stored in some tag or other in the music files? That > would have the advantage of surviving any need to rebuild the > slimserver database. In that case it starts to sound a little like an > earlier discussion on segmenting the database by owner (not quite the > same I realise, but possibly solvable with a single solution) I see this requiring essentially three things, two of which I mentioned in the first post.
- multiple music libraries Different libraries could be created by pointing at different locations -or- they could be pointed at the same location, but filtered in some way. In this case you might have the same root music folder, but filter on a song 'content rating'. - user profiles and logins The 'Superuser' (Admin, whatever) would create users and then say which libraries each user may have access to. You could create appropriate libraries for the little ones. You would also assign an owner to each Squeezebox so that only that user's libraries could be seen on the remote ui. The web interface would have a user login (which would be optional, for those with no need for multiple users) and the user would only have access to their libraries there as well. - track and/or content content rating tags Yes, this information would need to be stored in tags to survive a clear/rescan. Maybe some tags already exist for this purpose, or maybe SlimServer can forge some new ground. -- JJZolx Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26874 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
