It seems to me that, months ago, someone (might even have been me)
looked into this and it's a can of worms.

There are several sources for the gap.

There are several encoders of MP3s, not all support gapless in the same
way, and some not at all. Older versions of encoders that now support
gapless didn't at some earlier time. 

Some of the competitors who now support gapless do it by cheating, that
is, by merely truncating silence in a fixed way. Since the definition of
silence is artificially imposed rather than a reproduction of the
recording, the playback will still be in some way incorrect.

The fix needs both client (that is, SB) and server changes.

The server is open source but the player is not. That means that
someone at Slim with access to the player source and time must define
an architecture for this new feature before code for the server can be
defined.

People with access to the client code have been busy making wireless
work. Since that's been a hot topic the last 6 months, that's probably
all the firmware resources Slim has tied up in that area.

(myself, I could do without wireless ... I think it's a toy and no
substitute for real copper ... especially since it's been a distraction
for the last 6 months .... but that's just me)

The player now sees none of the ID3 tags (according to Vidur), so
there's no easy way to just pass the LAME gapless tags through to the
player. Thus new architecture needs to be done between the player and
the server ... something that needs to be done with some care.

There, I think that's a (somewhat) concise summary of what I remember
of the issue. There's more, of course, but I didn't want to get into
details.


-- 
Michaelwagner
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27384

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to