Terje;142952 Wrote: > It's good to see that I'm no longer the only one wanting native WMAL > support. I don't have a Transporter or any plans of getting one, but I > already bought 3 SB3's and have my WMAL library is growing bigger every > day. And, even if WMAL is a closed and licensed format it makes my day > easier when working with various other software for different media > player devices. I like to spend my time listening to the music, not > playing around with different formats. It's all about the music, > remember! > > I would like for SlimDevices to step forward and say something official > about this soon. Maybe just to show us that the licensing costs are so > huge that they cannot be justified. However, I would even be willing to > pay a small fee from a WMAL license for my boxes.
Can you explain what it is that makes the current transcoding solution a problem? I used transcoding for a long time without any problems until my particular format of choice was supported in firmware. I don't recall any great hardships. -- radish ------------------------------------------------------------------------ radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28267 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
