tomjtx wrote: > snarlydwarf;171267 Wrote: >> You mean "rip them back in whatever *lossless* non-DRM'd format you like >> or you will further diminish the sound quality, converting that 128k AAC >> into the equivalent of a 96k or lower but still taking the disc space of >> a 128k" > > OK, I'm confused ( as usual). > If you burn a 128 aac to disc and re-import at 128aac it's still 128, > right? So it's still the same (bad) quality but at least not inferior > to the original download.
It's 2nd generation 128. You're encoding it twice with the resulting additional degradation of the sound. Analogy: record a CD to cassette, then record the cassette onto another cassette. The same principle applies. R. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
