cliveb;174416 Wrote: > My two cents: > > It strikes me that a lot of people's complaints about SlimServer are > founded on the expectation that its web interface should be a nice > media player, along the lines of iTunes. Well, that's not its purpose. > The audio player is the Squeezebox, and the day-to-day interface device > is the remote. They work well. > > As far as I'm concerned, the web inteface to SlimServer is for doing > occasional administration and maintenance operations. And for this, it > does the job. Granted, it's a bit clunky and sluggish, but when you > only fire it up once in a blue moon, who cares? > > To those who want to use a computer as the user interface to your music > collection, I say this: the Slim Devices paradigm is wrong for you. > Don't try to force the Squeezebox/SlimServer approach into doing things > it was never intended for.
You should tell that to the developpers. Why did they put media player functionality in SlimServer? ;-) I'm like you, I use the remote most of the time. And it works just fine. That's why I tolerate the Web UI. -- Nostromo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nostromo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6322 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32104 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
