aubuti;184326 Wrote: > Just yesterday I realized that my dual boot (Win2K / Ubuntu) box > accessing my music library on a NAS is perfect for just such a test. > But if I confirm a big difference in scanning times between Linux and > Windows, doesn't that still leave two possible explanations (at least): > bad implementation of SMB on Windows and/or something peculiar to > slimserver on Windows? > > Anyway, I'll give it a shot sometime in the next few days and report > back. As well as a report on the scan time when the NAS runs slimserver > and is therefore accessing a local disk.
My money is on similar times for both OSs. -- jonheal Jon Heal says: Have a nice day! http://www.theheals.org/ ~~~ SB3 (wired - 6.3.1) | Home-brew PC running XP Pro | DENON DRA-395 | PSB Stratus Bronze (2) | Outlaw Audio LFM-2 (1) | DIY Speaker Cables | Dayton Audio Interconnects ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jonheal's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2133 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33041 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
