haunyack wrote: > kdf;186010 Wrote: > >> On 5-Mar-07, at 11:44 PM, haunyack wrote: >> >>> I understand your point. >>> My point, simply - (as other have stated more eloquently than I) >>> I have putchased this piece of hardware on good faith. >>> Why doesn't it perform as stated? >>> >> I'm sure you are aware that not everything works 100%, 100% of the >> time. Given a sample set of a thousand units, there are bound to be >> some issues. Getting that one bad one sucks, but it doesn't mean >> everything is bad. >> >> >>> When did I agree to be involved in the evolution of the supporting >>> (albeit primitive) software? >>> >> when you downloaded it and started using it? everyone is innvolved. >> >> >>> Is my usage of this wonderfull hardware dependent on my contribution >>> >> to >> >>> this obviously faulty software? >>> >>> >> you get what you put in. >> >> -kdf >> > > Not neccesarily. > So - I'm over my rant and I'll continue using 6.3.1 until the > truncation bug is identified and "fixed". > > Meanwhile let me say that I have seen the effects of global warming > here in Oregon. > On Mt. Hood - the Hood glacier completely melted off last summer. > I was raised in the shadow of that mountain and have never seen it so > bare. >
Better start building new nuclear plants, then... Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
