azinck3;188035 Wrote: 
> I'm surprised you haven't run into the awkwardness of stream.mp3.  
> Perhaps some streaming clients work better than others. 
> 
> This is why I don't like it:
> 
> 1) Setting bitrate limiting for the first time is a little strange. 
> You have to connect to your server, then set limiting, but depending on
> how long it took you to do that you may have already buffered a fair
> amount of silence and it seems like I always have to disconnect then
> reconnect to the stream to get the lower bitrate.
> 
> 2) The silence stream in older versions of slimserver was always
> delivered at some ridiculously high bitrate like 320kbps.  This was
> awkward as you kept stopping and rebuffering silence and it would also
> starve your upload bandwidth of your home connection while you were
> trying to use the web interface to cue up your playlist.  I think this
> has now been fixed.
> 
> 3) By far the biggest problem is how far ahead the mp3 playback
> software buffers!  I don't know if different playback clients might
> work better than others but what tends to happen is that, after just a
> few minutes of listening, I've buffered half my playlist.  So if I try
> to interact with slimserver to control my playback in any way the
> effects of the inputs aren't heard for sometimes 10 minutes or more. 
> So, changing tracks means (1) clicking the song I want to listen to in
> the playlist (2) disconnecting my mp3 client from the stream (3)
> reconnecting my mp3 client to the stream (and in the process I've
> missed the beginning of the song).
> 
> Anyhow, this isn't meant to be a rant against the failures of
> stream.mp3 - most of these are intrinsic to the unidirectional nature
> of the stream and I like the fact that at least the option is there to
> use it.  And none of this is a big deal because softsqueeze works
> nearly perfectly.  I try to urge users towards softsqueeze as much as
> possible because I've seen too many new slimserver users who just
> casually wanted to try it out and end up disappointed merely due to the
> limitations of stream.mp3.

Ah, I can see why you don't like it....!
for 1), I've not really found that a problem.  I set the bitrate limit,
and reconnect my media player (I use XMMS).

I've not noticed 2) to be a problem, perhaps I've lucky (I'm running
SlimServer 6.5.2)

I'm amazed about 3) - I've not come across this before.  Typically XMMS
buffers a few seconds, and thats it.  When I make changes in the Slim
UI, it therefore takes a few seconds for changes to become apparent. 
Not perfect but I don't mind.

My feeling about streaming is that it is an entirely sub-optimal way of
listening to my music, but as my normal mode is FLAC files streamed to
my SB3 at home, and normally I wouldn't get to listen to my music at
work, I'm OK with putting up with the inadequacies.  Beats having to
load up my 256k MP3 player!


-- 
chris.mason
------------------------------------------------------------------------
chris.mason's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3323
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33543

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to