Pale Blue Ego wrote: > My expectations are the same as those of the people complaining the > loudest. The difference is, I'm not having any of the problems they > are. I've been using slimserver for 5 years and "it just works". I > used to stay several months behind the current release, just to be safe > - but the releases were coming much faster back then. And generally I > wouldn't upgrade unless there was some compelling new feature I wanted. > For instance, since 6.5.1 is working great, I won't consider upgrading > until 7.x, because the only thing missing now (for me) is support for > embedded album art in FLAC.
Ditto. I find the number of "poor quality" threads that crop up here quite baffling, actually -- it's always just worked for me, ever since I first installed version 5.4. If there was one critical error that Slim made, I think it was the high-profile bundle they did with Infrant that gave people some false expectations of the level of performance they could expect from running the server on a NAS. - Marc _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
