jonheal;207725 Wrote: > Gutted! Wow! You take your branding seriously! > > I happen to like Logitech's logo. Clearly, it was created by a > designer, and with all due respect to Sean and Company, I suspect the > Slim Devices logo was an in-house job. (Could be wrong, of course.) The > Logitech logo, visually, is a nice blend of whimsy and techy. > Proportionally, it's nice and "actively" balanced, with a center of > attention at a good "thirds" point. I also like the way the logo is > positioned on the aluminum bezel at a point that equates to the > proportion of aluminum to plastic on the face of the unit as a whole. > > I'm sure the "whiteness" of the logo in the photo is due to camera > flash. > > Good job, Sean and Company!!
Hi You obviously take your logo's very seriously. Its not that branding is paramount, when we all know full well that how the thing sounds is most important. I might reserve a little scepticism about the take-over until I can see that the long term road map hasn't been completely re-written by Logitech in favour of cheap, poor quality products with below par customer service. There is a reason that the Transporter doesn't have the Logitech logo on the front, no one would seriously spend that amount of cash on a product with that branding so prominent - and there is no argument there I'm afraid. So why can't that transfer down the product line a little? I'm not against Logitech staking claim to their new baby, but (as per my post) something a little less "in yer face"? Regards, Nic -- DrNic ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DrNic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=92 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35899
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
