JJZolx;212223 Wrote: > The bigger difference is probably that you're running one scan with > local files and another across a network share. What happened to that > 114,000 songs number that you reported initially. How did it end up > going down? > > What version of SlimServer are you running on the two machines?
The large discrepancy was dealt with by doing a full rescan of the network share. The remaining differences are those I reported subsequently, viz: Linux 4,449 albums with 65,721 songs Windows 4,452 albums with 65,795 songs Why should a scan across a network share yield a different result - if networking was that unreliable corporate networks would be unworkable. The files are wither there or they aren't. The bug / fault must lie in the software? Version info as follows: 6.5.2 - 12047 - Windows Server 2003 - EN - cp1252 6.5.3 - 12232 - Debian - EN - iso-8859-1 Guess I'll update the Windows instance, do a full rescan and see whether there are any remaining differences. -- egd Transporter >> SCA2 >> SCM100SLAT via balanced XLR Linux and loving IT! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ egd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3425 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36469 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
