snarlydwarf wrote: > . Higher cost for many people (ie, my server is also my router, file > server and web server).
Exactly. It was the fact that the SD model fit in so nicely with my existing home server infrastructure that attracted me to the squeezebox in the first place. I already had all of my MP3s on the linux server in the basement, and my wife and I were listening to them on our windows desktop boxes via samba, long before I bought my first squeezebox. If SD were only selling an all-in-one thick client like MrSinatra wants, I wouldn't have given it another look. The niche that I occupy may be a relatively small one, as consumer markets go, but I'm quite happy that SD has chosen to serve it so well. - Marc _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
