Michael Herger;218586 Wrote: > As one of the major problems with SlimServer on NAS devices is memory > consumption, I wonder why there aren't more users trying to offload > MySQL to some other machine. I once made my SlimServer use a MySQL > instance running on my web host. Or get yourself a NSLU as a DB server > - you could call this a n-tier SlimServer :-)I suspect most people running > SlimServer on a NAS is doing it because they don't have any other machine running 24/7. If you have a web host, why not run SlimServer on that to and just keep the music on the NAS ? Am I missing some obvious reason why it would be preferable to run SlimServer on the NAS if you already got a 24/7 machine which surely has more memory and faster processor than the NAS ?
Michael Herger;218586 Wrote: > I doubt any of them would lower the complexity of today's solution. > Added flexibility often results in increased complexity. In fact I > blame SlimServer's myriad of settings to the flexibility users asked > for.I totally agree. -- erland Erland Isaksson 'My homepage' (http://erland.homeip.net) 'My download page' (http://erland.homeip.net/download) (Developer of 'TrackStat, SQLPlayList, DynamicPlayList, Custom Browse, Custom Scan, Custom Skip, Multi Library and RandomPlayList plugins' (http://wiki.erland.homeip.net/index.php/Category:SlimServer)) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=37279 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
