For me, the main reason I'd like to see 802.11n support is for use with the wireless bridging capability. I use that option on my SB3, and plan to use it on the next SB3/SBR/whatever that I buy. Having the additional bandwidth would be nice if I add a lot of stuff behind the bridge, but for what I need now 802.11g is fine.
I'm crossing my fingers that SB4/SBR2 has n support, though. :) On Jan 8, 2008 12:12 AM, kdf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think this is true. At least, my early pre-n Belkin router > doesn't suffer, so I'd be surprised if more recent ones do. > 802.11G routers suffered when 802.11B devices were on the network, but > part of 11N is the support for G and B without suffering from > performance loss. > > As for not supporting it in a Squeezebox...it's a draft and also well > beyond what the device needs for plenty of playback bandwidth. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
