mvalera;254763 Wrote: > Enoch the price is the price. If you don't feel it's worth the money > we're asking, then you can feel free to vote with your wallet. > > It's smaller, faster, cheaper and has more functionality than our > competitor's controller. We feel that we have priced it aggressively. > I'm sorry you don't agree. > > Mike
I think you guys have seriously missed the boat here. Your "competition" is not really your direct competition! Sonos' customers are looking for one thing. An all-inclusive, simple to use product that streams audio in a neat little package that puts speakers and amp in one box. Your product is purchased by people who would rather have better (separate) speakers and amp, are more geeky, and know how to put the system and its parts together. They also are looking for a better price. I would guess that many consider the $300 Squeezebox to be a little steep. But at least it plays music. You have, IMO way overpriced the controller and using Sonos prices of their products is a serious mistake in determining the price of YOURS. You may have no problems selling that $300 remote to your Transporter customers, but I doubt that you will sell many to your Squeezebox customers. 'Just a thought .. -- NFLnut ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NFLnut's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13180 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41805 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
