On 13-Jan-08, at 2:42 PM, pnielsen wrote: > >> 2) Launcing a new product with 802.11g instead of 802.11n or even >> with >> both g,n and a is also crazy (especially after the tons of issues >> with >> wireless connectivity..) > > Consider the competition. What other music players are offering > 802.11n > today? > Not to mention that 802.11n is a DRAFT. Interoperation is not guaranteed among different manufacturers and I for one am glad to avoid the screaming that would ensue over that and over upgrades to official 802.11n if/when that EVER happens. Whining about the lack of n pales in comparison.
> mik63;258170 Wrote: >> 3) The audio specs are not better at all. It was not intended to be better. It was intended to be cheaper, and it is for the Receiver alone. It's not for everyone, and it's nice that you have been able to choose. I'm sure many others will be very happy for the option. -kdf _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
