> I bought a WRAP device (www.pcengines.com) and installed m0n0wall on it

it's http://www.pcengines.ch - for those who're interested (and the product is 
EOL :-/).

> What would be great is to have the possibilty to enter a FQDN instead
> of just an IP for the Squeezeserver. This would not solve the problems
> for XDSL.. but if the "server IP" changes, all of the remote
> Squeezeboxes would not have to change the IP.

I always wondered whether anybody would come up with a solution for the 
SqueezeBox _Controller_. It's an open Linux platform. You could use it as the 
gateway to the remote server, using SSH tunneling or openvpn or something... 
Then your SB would only have to connect to the controller, which in turn 
connected to the server to feed your player... Hm...

> My second request would to have built in security for squeezeboxes. You
> could then enter a password on the Squeezebox and just NAT all traffic
> from any location to ports 9000 and 3483..

I doubt this will be feasible as the SB's memory and CPU is close to fully 
loaded. But feel free to submit an enhancement request at bugs.slimdevices.com 
(if there isn't one for this already). The request sounds reasonable, and 
future devices might have more resources.

-- 

Michael
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to