Suprlite7;271288 Wrote: > I recommend the next Transporter be 1/2 its present size which could > easily be done without sacrificing any of the elements within.
The Transporter was designed with audiophiles and the higher end market in mind. To that end, the device needs to be X inches wide and just as important rack mountable. Additionally and more important in my mind, the Transporter needs to be big enough to keep from being pulled off the shelf by the weight of all the heavy audiophile type cables I have plugged into the back! I know it is just my opinion, but the Transporter is about as small as it can be still satisfying the audiophile crowd. Please keep it the same or make it larger (more room for mods for people into that)! I would not want to come home to find my new smaller Transporter off its shelf and hanging by the interconnects behind all the other equipment! -- iPhone iPhone Last.FM http://www.lastfm.com/user/mePhone Media Room: Transporter, Vandersteen Quatro Signature, Ayre MX-R Mono Blocks, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, VCC-5 Reference Center Channel, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco 710, RAM Oppo DV970HD, VeraStarr 6.4SE Living Room: Squeezebox 3, Vandersteen Model 3A Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold Bedroom: Squeezebox 3, Thiel 2.3, NAD C370 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43697 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
