Pat Farrell;277864 Wrote: > JimC wrote: > > I agree with EnochLight... in my experience, SqueezeCenter is a lot > > faster than SlimServer. There's clearly something unique about > these > > installations that are creating a slowdown. > > Or perhaps it is just expectations and the unfortunate timing of when > the slowness is visible. > > Specifically, the initial scan can be slow, and that is exactly when > folks who have just unboxed their Duet, plugged it in, installed > SqueezeCenter, etc., are waiting to hear great music. > > A few hours later, when the scan is done, the performance is > good/fast/better. But the impression lingers. > > Of course, I've been running SC7 for so many months that I can't > remember how long it took to get my ~800 CDs scanned. > > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com/
Yeah, I'd love to see the initial scan complete faster, but it's a lot faster than it was in 6.5.x, in my experience. My scan took about 54 minutes for 1100-ish CDs on my Linux-based server... for comparison, Media Monkey took about 45 minutes on the same collection (though on a different box and OS, with comparable h/w). In this case, though, switching back to 6.5.4 gave the OP the impression the "slowness" was fixed. This leads me to believe there's something specific about these installations. -=> Jim -- JimC "well, she wasn't all of that, but she sure was some of that." -- BKlaas' college buddy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JimC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9428 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=44503 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
