SuperQ;280845 Wrote: > Would you want it be stereo? mono? mono with optional stereo > separation? >
Mono is fine - > > How much would you pay for such a thing? > Depends on the solution:-) I gues I would pay maybe 20 % more than for a simple receiver if it had just built-in mono amp and speaker (controlled by the Duet). If you add a display, navigation buttons (or remote) and stereo/spdif line output you could add the same percentage to the price of a SB3, but that wouldn't be interesting to me personally. > > Would a T-Amp provide enough volume? Would digital volume control be > ok? > I don't know t'amp, but I found a link stating something like 6W RMS, which should be enough. Digital volume control would be fine - like I said, it doesn't have to be hifi. My wish is to replace the old deranged "transistor radios" that are scattered around and mostly used for background listening. > > SB3 or Duet based? Yes;-) Again, it depends. Local control would be nice, but if that means the price will be comparable to the SB3, I'd go for Duet. If lower quality components and buttons instead of a remote could lower the price of a SB3 style unit that would be great! I can see that people have lots of different wishes for this kind of thing (which may be one reason the product isn't there?). Does Logitech allow third-party hardware-players? How much would it cost to add SB-functionality to "any-digital-soundproducing-unit" like a boombox or WI-FI radio - I'm not thinking DIY, but for the manufacturer? I would think that for a wifi radio the cost would be minimal? -- ThomP ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThomP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15471 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=44896 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
