Jeff Flowerday;284754 Wrote: > I can understand why disc number would cause this to happen, but in the > case when the disc number is 1/1 then it should really ignore the disc > number, IMO. I think the scanner completely ignores the values in the disc number tag when it reads the files, it merely checks for the presence of the tag and adds the value to the database. The problem is that discnumber doesn't need to contain the total number of discs. An entry like DISCNUMBER=1 is valid and there's no way for the scanner to know if there are more discs of this album or not. But you are right, the scanner could check for 1/1 values (but it also needs to check for DISC=1 and DISCC=1 and all other variants) and ignore them. IMO it doesn't make sense to tag files with DISCNUMBER=1/1 anyway as this provides zero information. DISCNUMBER tags are only really useful on multi-disc albums.
-s. -- slimpy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slimpy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1524 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45280 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
