Some how my previous post disappeared so I am posting it again. Has anybody experienced that scaling down of cover arts in the web-interface is introducing artifacts?
I have all my albums cover arts scanned in and saved at 500x500 as jpg images, however some looks pretty bad when scaled down by the Squeezecenter web ui. I have attached an example of a cover art. The first picture shows the artifacts introduced by Squeezecenter, the second shows the picture full res (so there are no problems with the picture itself) and the third is the same picture as scaled down by Nero Photosnap Viewer (which shows that it can be scaled down correctly). Has anybody else seen this problem? Should I open it as a bug? Thanks. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Filename: Capture3.JPG | |Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4956| +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Aguida ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aguida's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9285 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46798 _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
