On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:39:20PM +0100, Stuart Rossiter wrote: > All, > > Our lectures say things like: > > "You might not think that [inefficiency] has much to do with testing, but > study after study has shown that the more you invest up front in quality, > the sooner your program will be ready to use." > > (V4 Testing Intro: http://software-carpentry.org/v4/test/intro.html) > > Do we have any kind of list/database of supporting research, and/or is > there any intention to integrate that into the notes? (I'm not very > familiar with all the notes, so I don't know how consistent or not they are > in that regard. There may also be a deliberate intention to do > 'non-formal-academic' style slides without copious references....)
Hi Stuart, there are at least a few references in this masterpiece of a paper by Wilson GV et al: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001745 cheers, --titus p.s. ...just to continue the hagiographical commentary :) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
