On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dav Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> Smart windows-hacker types...
>
> I have just recently gotten chocolatey_ to work (in classic Bay Area form:
> Chocolatey is Homebrew_ for windows). Is this a reasonable recommendation
> for a step up from the SWC installer?
>

I've been playing around with chocolatey a bit and I think it's really
cool, but I think for many of our students asking them to install a command
line package manager and then use it before the workshop is going to be
expecting a lot. Most of the students in novice workshops have never used a
CLI before. In an earlier version of the installer just having them run a
Python file cause *a lot* of confusion. That said, I think that it might
well be possible to rewrite the installer to use chocolatey, which might be
quite a bit simpler than the current implementation. I'm not sure whether
it's worth the work at this point since Windows installation has been
running very smoothly for the past year or so.

For an intermediate workshop it might be OK and the best way to find that
out would be for someone to give it a try and report back.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to