Hello, I don't think I have seen it shared on this list, so here you go: http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v11/n5/pdf/nphys3313.pdf
I'm not too fond of the paper per se, it seems too vague and too detailed at the same time. I stopped reading half-way because it was painful, then cruised to the end... to see (well, to make sure) that SWC was cited (it is). Strangely enough, they write ‘software carpentry’ and software-carpentry (not Software Carpentry, anyway). Cheers, Marianne _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
