Good idea, Peter - I've created a discussion issue on GitHub here [1],
and I'd be grateful if people could add comments to it instead of
sending replies to this list. I'll collate and turn into a blog post.
Thanks,
Greg
[1] https://github.com/swcarpentry/site/issues/1085
On 2015-09-07 11:02 AM, Peter van Heusden wrote:
I'm really interested in this field (and scientific workflow systems
more generally), but perhaps we should get this off the Discuss list.
NoWorkflow uses Prolog for reasoning across its workflow traces - this
approach has been mentioned previously in Bowers, McPhillips and Anand
et al's work ("Provenance in collection-oriented scientific workflows"
= doi 10.1002/cpe.1226 and "Efficient Provenance Storage over Nested
Data Collections" - doi 10.1145/1516360.1516470
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1516360.1516470>). I've installed
NoWorkflow at our lab and will try and use it in future work - perhaps
over time some "best practices" can be built up?
Peter
On 7 September 2015 at 11:39, Bartosz <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Raniere,
You forgot to attach the link, but I guess you meant this project [1].
We have developed similar project, called sumatra, to track
provenance for python and non-python projects [2,3]
Sumatra has been used so far in neural modelling and data
analysis, but I am not aware of any reports describing use of
sumatra in real world projects. Perhaps, you could contact the
main developer, Andrew Davison (in cc), who might be able to
provide you with more information.
Yours,
Bartosz
[1] https://github.com/gems-uff/noworkflow
[2] http://pythonhosted.org/Sumatra/
[3] https://osf.io/rc5jf/
Hi everyone,
during last Spring I watched one talk from João Felipe, in copy,
about his M.S. project noWorkflow [1] that is under MIT
license and briefly
aims at allowing scientists to benefit from provenance
data analysis even
when they don't use a workflow system.
João contacted me because he is looking for open science projects
under developing that he could use as examples for noWorkflow
or that are interested in testing noWorkflow (I'm sure that he
will be happy
to help you doing it as easy as possible if this is the case).
Since I think that many people in this list could be interested
in João's project I'm sending this email.
You can contact João directly.
Cheers,
Raniere
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
--
Dr. Greg Wilson | [email protected]
Software Carpentry | http://software-carpentry.org
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
